
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- β +353% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 22,651).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β +353% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 22,651).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than M1 8-Core GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is M1 8-Core GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 5,000 β the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 353%. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+353% | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+54300% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The M1 8-Core GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The M1 8-Core GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) β a 323.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+324% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W β a 136.8% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 166.7+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD106 | β |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












