GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Mobility Radeon X1600
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Mobility Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Mobility Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+24520.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 2923.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
Mobility Radeon X1600
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (92 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 92 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 24520.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+24521% | 92 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+444% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1870% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+240% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+5275% | 0.08 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Mobility Radeon X1600 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon X1600. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+3100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+36% | 9.0c |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Avivo (Mobility Radeon X1600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Avivo |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+7767% | 1.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon X1600 was 87.7% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.9 (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2889.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $49-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+2889% | 1.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | Broadway |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #59 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Mobility Radeon X1600
