
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅568.9% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1035.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro
1999Why buy it
- ✅568.9% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1035.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 1999-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro
Quadro
The Quadro is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 1999. It features the Celsius architecture. The core clock speed is 135 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 220 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro's 5,000 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 353%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro uses Celsius, both on 5 nm vs 220 nm.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+353% | 5,000 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Celsius |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 220 nm |
| ROPs | 48+1100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 136+3300% | 4 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (Quadro). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2 Acceleration. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | MPEG-2 Acceleration |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+112% | 66.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.0 (Quadro) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1036% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 1999).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+1036% | 5.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | NV10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | 1999 |
| Ranking | #59 | #900 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












