GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro FX 2700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+4071.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 945.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (543 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Quadro FX 2700

2008

Why buy it

✅+4071.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 945.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (543 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro FX 2700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 543 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro FX 2700 is a 2008 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2008, 4071.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 299.0% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and you are getting 4071.5% higher G3D Mark. Quadro FX 2700 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro FX 2700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro FX 2700 is 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 543 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 2700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	177 FPS	24 FPS
medium	162 FPS	20 FPS
high	142 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	18 FPS
medium	118 FPS	15 FPS
high	101 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	11 FPS
medium	79 FPS	9 FPS
high	66 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro FX 2700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	425 FPS	24 FPS
medium	359 FPS	20 FPS
high	292 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	18 FPS
medium	229 FPS	15 FPS
high	186 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	12 FPS
medium	95 FPS	7 FPS
high	77 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro FX 2700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	855 FPS	24 FPS
medium	693 FPS	20 FPS
high	609 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	18 FPS
medium	527 FPS	15 FPS
high	452 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	12 FPS
medium	355 FPS	10 FPS
high	308 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	6 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro FX 2700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
1080p
low	775 FPS	24 FPS
medium	639 FPS	20 FPS
high	558 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	10 FPS
medium	503 FPS	8 FPS
high	435 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	6 FPS
medium	322 FPS	5 FPS
high	298 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro FX 2700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro FX 2700

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro FX 2700

The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro FX 2700's 543 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 4071.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
G3D Mark Score	22,651+4071%	543
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	4352+1713%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+3446%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+70%	80
L2 Cache	32 MB+12700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro FX 2700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro FX 2700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+12700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 16.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro FX 2700
TDP	160W-15%	189W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+4783%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100. The Quadro FX 2700 costs 74.9% less ($299 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 2700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 951.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).