
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro K4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+733.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $870 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2549.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,719 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌218% HIGHER MSRP$1,269 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro K4000
2013Why buy it
- ✅+733.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $870 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2549.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,269 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,719 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌218% HIGHER MSRP$1,269 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro K4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 17 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro K4000

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
The Quadro K4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points. Launch price was $1,269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro K4000's 2,719 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 733.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K4000 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (Quadro K4000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro K4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+733% | 2,719 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1673% | 1.244 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+7067% | 0.06 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+8321% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4000 has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.38 MB (Quadro K4000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+8321% | 0.38 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro K4000's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro K4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+316% | 34.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro K4000 launched at $1269. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 68.6% less ($870 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.1 (Quadro K4000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2604.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-69% | $1269 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+2605% | 2.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | GK106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #613 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












