GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro K620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅706.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 284.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Quadro K620

2014

Why buy it

✅706.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 284.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro K620?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 706.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 2,213 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro K620 is a 2014 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014, 923.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 166.0% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 706.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 923.5% higher G3D Mark. Quadro K620 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro K620 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro K620 is 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 2,213 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro K620 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
1080p
low	177 FPS	16 FPS
medium	162 FPS	10 FPS
high	142 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	7 FPS
medium	118 FPS	4 FPS
high	101 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	3 FPS
medium	79 FPS	2 FPS
high	66 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro K620

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
1080p
low	433 FPS	72 FPS
medium	363 FPS	45 FPS
high	294 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	21 FPS
medium	238 FPS	15 FPS
high	194 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	6 FPS
medium	102 FPS	4 FPS
high	84 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro K620

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
1080p
low	855 FPS	100 FPS
medium	693 FPS	80 FPS
high	609 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	75 FPS
medium	527 FPS	60 FPS
high	452 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	50 FPS
medium	355 FPS	40 FPS
high	308 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro K620

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
1080p
low	775 FPS	100 FPS
medium	639 FPS	80 FPS
high	558 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	75 FPS
medium	503 FPS	60 FPS
high	435 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	50 FPS
medium	322 FPS	40 FPS
high	298 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro K620

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro K620

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K620

The Quadro K620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1058 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,213 points. Launch price was $189.89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro K620's 2,213 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 923.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K620 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (Quadro K620). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K620). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
G3D Mark Score	22,651+924%	2,213
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4352+1033%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+2456%	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+126%	1124 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	136+467%	24
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+2163%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro K620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro K620's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The Quadro K620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro K620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro K620
TDP	160W	45W-72%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+188%	49.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro K620 launched at $150. The Quadro K620 costs 62.4% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14.8 (Quadro K620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 283.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).