GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P2200

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1493 MHz
Similar parts
·····

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P2200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 187.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Delivers 159.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
  • 19.4% longer card at 240mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
  • Measures 201mm instead of 240mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 7.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 187.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 141.3% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 9,386), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 5 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro P2200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 159.5% (56.8 vs 21.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 141.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
G3D Mark Score
22,651+141%
9,386
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Pascal
Process Node
5 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
4352+240%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+477%
3.822 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+70%
1493 MHz
ROPs
48+20%
40
TMUs
136+70%
80
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+815%
0.47 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+2460%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P2200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 carries 5 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the Quadro P2200. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+60%
5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+2460%
1.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
6th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
TDP
160W
75W-53%
Recommended PSU
550W
500W-9%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
201mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+13%
125.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 7% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 159.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiQuadro P2200
MSRP
$399-7%
$429
Performance per Dollar
56.8+159%
21.9
Codename
AD106
GP106
Release
May 18 2023
June 10 2019
Ranking
#59
#281

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.