G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+512.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 161% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
❌65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,698 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

✅+512.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 161% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
❌65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,698 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro P620?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 3,698 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P620 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 512.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 134.7% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $170 MSRP, and you are getting 512.5% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P620 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P620 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P620 is 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 3,698 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro P620 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
1080p
low	177 FPS	48 FPS
medium	162 FPS	29 FPS
high	142 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	32 FPS
medium	118 FPS	19 FPS
high	101 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	10 FPS
medium	79 FPS	7 FPS
high	66 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P620

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
1080p
low	425 FPS	73 FPS
medium	359 FPS	46 FPS
high	292 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	21 FPS
medium	229 FPS	15 FPS
high	186 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	6 FPS
medium	95 FPS	4 FPS
high	77 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P620

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
1080p
low	855 FPS	166 FPS
medium	693 FPS	133 FPS
high	609 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	125 FPS
medium	527 FPS	100 FPS
high	452 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	83 FPS
medium	355 FPS	67 FPS
high	308 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P620

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
1080p
low	775 FPS	147 FPS
medium	639 FPS	113 FPS
high	558 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	76 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	105 FPS
medium	503 FPS	83 FPS
high	435 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	61 FPS
medium	322 FPS	47 FPS
high	298 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Quadro P620

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro P620

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro P620's 3,698 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 512.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score	22,651+513%	3,698
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+750%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+1393%	1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+76%	1443 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	136+325%	32
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+2163%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (FL12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 120% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Quadro P620
TDP	160W	40W-75%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	145mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+53%	92.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. The Quadro P620 costs 57.4% less ($229 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 160.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).