
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Quadro P620
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅471.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 161% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
- ❌65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro P620's 3,698 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 512.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1443 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+513% | 3,698 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+750% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1393% | 1.478 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+76% | 1443 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+325% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2163% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P620 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the Quadro P620. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 120% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 40W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+53% | 92.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 57.4% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 160.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $170-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+161% | 21.8 |
| Codename | AD106 | GP107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #524 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














