
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+93.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 22,651).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
2021Why buy it
- ✅+93.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 22,651).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 11,715 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 93.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1410 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+93% | 11,715 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+386% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+773% | 2.527 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+80% | 1410 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 120% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 40W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 292.9+107% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | TU117 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #354 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












