
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅85.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌788.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 18W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 160W, a 142W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅85.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 160W, a 142W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌788.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 18W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 14,832 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 52.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+53% | 14,832 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+386% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+626% | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+50% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 159.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 18W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 824.0+482% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | TU117 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #548 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












