
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Quadro RTX 6000
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+26.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,901 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1899.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅323.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,887 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌1478.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Quadro RTX 6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 17,887 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 26.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 6000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+27% | 17,887 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+35% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+43% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 288+112% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 72+112% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 576+324% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX 6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 carries 24 GB. Quadro RTX 6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX 6000. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-38% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+106% | 68.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 93.7% cheaper ($5901 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1928.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-94% | $6300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+1929% | 2.8 |
| Codename | AD106 | TU102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #99 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














