
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Radeon AI PRO R9700
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,651 vs 28,589).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅+26.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌225.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon AI PRO R9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 26.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 136 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 28,589+26% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+6% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2920 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 136 | 256+88% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 64+88% |
| Tensor Cores | 136+6% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 carries 32 GB. Radeon AI PRO R9700 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon AI PRO R9700. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+49% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 69.3% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 158.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon AI PRO R9700 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-69% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+158% | 22.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














