GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 6790

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6790

2011Core: 840 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 6790 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 6790 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 6790: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 835.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 439.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon HD 6790

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 835.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1345.5% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 1,567), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon HD 6790 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 439.8% (56.8 vs 10.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 6790 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon HD 6790

The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon HD 6790's 1,567 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1345.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
G3D Mark Score
22,651+1346%
1,567
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TeraScale 2
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
4352+444%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+1541%
1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
136+240%
40
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+2587%
0.16 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon HD 6790 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6790 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 carries 1 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6790. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6790) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+700%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+6300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6790). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
DirectX
12.2+9%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (Radeon HD 6790). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6790).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
None
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Radeon HD 6790 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
TDP
160W
150W-6%
Recommended PSU
550W
450W-18%
Power Connector
8-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
240mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
141.6+1262%
10.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6790 was 62.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 441% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon HD 6790
MSRP
$399
$149-63%
Performance per Dollar
56.8+441%
10.5
Codename
AD106
Barts
Release
May 18 2023
April 4 2011
Ranking
#59
#759

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.