
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1549.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
Radeon HD 7850M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,373 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon HD 7850M
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1549.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 160W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 160W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,373 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon HD 7850M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7850M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon HD 7850M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 7850M
Radeon HD 7850M
The Radeon HD 7850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,373 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon HD 7850M's 1,373 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1549.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 7850M uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7850M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7850M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+1550% | 1,373 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+580% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2453% | 0.864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+240% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2587% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 7850M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7850M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7850M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7850M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7850M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7850M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,DivX (Radeon HD 7850M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 7850M's 40W — a 120% difference. The Radeon HD 7850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7850M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 40W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+313% | 34.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 7850M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Heathrow |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #59 | #787 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












