
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+311.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 209.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅+311.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 209.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 18.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 311.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+312% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+182% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 87.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+88% | 153.6 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-20% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+415% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire launched at $300. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 18.3 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 210.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+210% | 18.3 |
| Codename | AD106 | Neptune CF |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #59 | #350 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












