
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+142.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+142.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 142.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+143% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+318% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+146% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5600M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 186.5+32% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 12 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












