
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+257.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 168.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,337 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅+257.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 168.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,337 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro 570's 6,337 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 257.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+257% | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+143% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+457% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+129% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+21% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+877% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 120W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+168% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 169.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+169% | 21.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #59 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












