G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+97.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 295.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,469 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
100.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅+97.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 295.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 130W instead of 160W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 130W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,469 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
100.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 11,469 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro 5700 is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 97.5% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $400 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 97.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 295.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $799 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	177 FPS	154 FPS
medium	162 FPS	136 FPS
high	142 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	137 FPS
medium	118 FPS	115 FPS
high	101 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	62 FPS
medium	79 FPS	55 FPS
high	66 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	425 FPS	226 FPS
medium	359 FPS	188 FPS
high	292 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	146 FPS
medium	229 FPS	120 FPS
high	186 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	76 FPS
medium	95 FPS	63 FPS
high	77 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	855 FPS	516 FPS
medium	693 FPS	413 FPS
high	609 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	258 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	387 FPS
medium	527 FPS	310 FPS
high	452 FPS	258 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	194 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	258 FPS
medium	355 FPS	206 FPS
high	308 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	129 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
1080p
low	775 FPS	378 FPS
medium	639 FPS	325 FPS
high	558 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	301 FPS
medium	503 FPS	262 FPS
high	435 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	162 FPS
medium	322 FPS	130 FPS
high	298 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 11,469 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 97.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
G3D Mark Score	22,651+97%	11,469
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352+89%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+255%	6.221 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+88%	1350 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	144+6%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700
TDP	160W	130W-19%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+61%	88.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 294.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).