G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅40.7% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅40.7% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 40.7% more FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 44.9% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 40.7% more estimated average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and 44.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	177 FPS	166 FPS
medium	162 FPS	148 FPS
high	142 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	146 FPS
medium	118 FPS	124 FPS
high	101 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	69 FPS
medium	79 FPS	60 FPS
high	66 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	433 FPS	301 FPS
medium	363 FPS	255 FPS
high	294 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	203 FPS
medium	238 FPS	172 FPS
high	194 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	99 FPS
medium	102 FPS	82 FPS
high	84 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	855 FPS	703 FPS
medium	693 FPS	563 FPS
high	609 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	528 FPS
medium	527 FPS	422 FPS
high	452 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	352 FPS
medium	355 FPS	281 FPS
high	308 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	176 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	775 FPS	259 FPS
medium	639 FPS	224 FPS
high	558 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	197 FPS
medium	503 FPS	175 FPS
high	435 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	121 FPS
medium	322 FPS	105 FPS
high	298 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	67 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 15,633 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 44.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	22,651+45%	15,633
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 5.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+21%	3584 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+105%	10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+69%	1500 MHz
ROPs	48	64 ×2+33%
TMUs	136	224 ×2+65%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+389%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	160W-47%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+172%	52.1