GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 48

2019Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 105.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 126.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.

Radeon Pro Vega 48

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 12.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $450 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 105.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 101% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 11,270), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro Vega 48 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 126.7% (56.8 vs 25.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 48

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 11,270 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 101%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
G3D Mark Score
22,651+101%
11,270
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 5.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4352+42%
3072
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+176%
7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+95%
1300 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
136
192+41%
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+473%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCE 4.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
TDP
160W
30W-81%
Recommended PSU
550W
1W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
Integrated
Length
240mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
141.6
375.7+165%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 11.3% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 127.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP
$399-11%
$450
Performance per Dollar
56.8+127%
25.0
Codename
AD106
Vega 10
Release
May 18 2023
March 19 2019
Ranking
#59
#241

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.