G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅74.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 215.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
100.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅74.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 215.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
100.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 74.0% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 14,380 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro W5700 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 57.5% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $400 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 74.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 57.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 215.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $799 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	177 FPS	150 FPS
medium	162 FPS	132 FPS
high	142 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	127 FPS
medium	118 FPS	104 FPS
high	101 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	74 FPS
medium	79 FPS	62 FPS
high	66 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	425 FPS	226 FPS
medium	359 FPS	190 FPS
high	292 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	146 FPS
medium	229 FPS	122 FPS
high	186 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	78 FPS
medium	95 FPS	66 FPS
high	77 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	855 FPS	647 FPS
medium	693 FPS	518 FPS
high	609 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	485 FPS
medium	527 FPS	388 FPS
high	452 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	324 FPS
medium	355 FPS	259 FPS
high	308 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	162 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	775 FPS	332 FPS
medium	639 FPS	284 FPS
high	558 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	275 FPS
medium	503 FPS	236 FPS
high	435 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	147 FPS
medium	322 FPS	116 FPS
high	298 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro W5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 14,380 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 57.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1930 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
G3D Mark Score	22,651+58%	14,380
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352+89%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+148%	8.893 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+31%	1930 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	144+6%
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 24.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro W5700
TDP	160W-22%	205W
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+102%	70.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 215.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).