GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5700X

2019Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 2040 MHz

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 55.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 222.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro W5700X

2019

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 150.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 55.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 28.8% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 17,591), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon Pro W5700X has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 7nm, 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 222.4% (56.8 vs 17.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro W5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon Pro W5700X

The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 17,591 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 28.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
G3D Mark Score
22,651+29%
17,591
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4352+89%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+135%
9.4 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+24%
2040 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
136
144+6%
L2 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W5700X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X carries 16 GB. Radeon Pro W5700X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700X. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
DirectX
12.2+2%
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCN 2.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
HEVC,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 24.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
TDP
160W-22%
205W
Recommended PSU
550W-15%
650W
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
305mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2-50%
4
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+65%
85.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 60.1% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 222.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon Pro W5700X
MSRP
$399-60%
$999
Performance per Dollar
56.8+223%
17.6
Codename
AD106
Navi 10
Release
May 18 2023
December 11 2019
Ranking
#59
#130

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.