G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+168.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 54.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅+168.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 54.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6400?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 8,428 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO W6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 168.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 74.2% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 168.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 54.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W6400 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $229 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	177 FPS	107 FPS
medium	162 FPS	95 FPS
high	142 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	95 FPS
medium	118 FPS	80 FPS
high	101 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	45 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	433 FPS	165 FPS
medium	363 FPS	130 FPS
high	294 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	108 FPS
medium	238 FPS	85 FPS
high	194 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	56 FPS
medium	102 FPS	44 FPS
high	84 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	855 FPS	333 FPS
medium	693 FPS	292 FPS
high	609 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	235 FPS
medium	527 FPS	211 FPS
high	452 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	137 FPS
medium	355 FPS	124 FPS
high	308 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	775 FPS	285 FPS
medium	639 FPS	206 FPS
high	558 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	210 FPS
medium	503 FPS	149 FPS
high	435 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	105 FPS
medium	322 FPS	76 FPS
high	298 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W6400

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 8,428 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 168.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	22,651+169%	8,428
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4352+467%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+516%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+9%	2331 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+183%	48
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+1620%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+183%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	168.6+19%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 54.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).