G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 704.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 295W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅30.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
902.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌84.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 160W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 704.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 295W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅30.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
902.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌84.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 160W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 30.9% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 24.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 48 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7900 is about 902.3% more expensive on MSRP at $3,999 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 30.9% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 24.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7900 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (160W vs 295W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7900. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7900 currently gives you 24.5% higher G3D Mark and 30.9% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	177 FPS	262 FPS
medium	162 FPS	242 FPS
high	142 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	246 FPS
medium	118 FPS	205 FPS
high	101 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	174 FPS
medium	79 FPS	145 FPS
high	66 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	425 FPS	813 FPS
medium	359 FPS	639 FPS
high	292 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	617 FPS
medium	229 FPS	495 FPS
high	186 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	320 FPS
medium	95 FPS	256 FPS
high	77 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	855 FPS	945 FPS
medium	693 FPS	775 FPS
high	609 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	714 FPS
medium	527 FPS	587 FPS
high	452 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	498 FPS
medium	355 FPS	412 FPS
high	308 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	775 FPS	946 FPS
medium	639 FPS	801 FPS
high	558 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	714 FPS
medium	503 FPS	604 FPS
high	435 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	505 FPS
medium	322 FPS	437 FPS
high	298 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 24.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	22,651	28,211+25%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352	6144+41%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+178%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+2%	2495 MHz
ROPs	48	192+300%
TMUs	136	384+182%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+43%	3 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	96+182%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	48 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	864 GB/s+200%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 59.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	160W-46%	295W
Recommended PSU	550W-27%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+48%	95.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 90% less ($3600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 700% better value.