G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+1110.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 352.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,871 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

✅+1110.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 352.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,871 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 2100?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 1,871 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro WX 2100 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 1110.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 167.8% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 1110.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 2100 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 2100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,871 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 2100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
1080p
low	177 FPS	46 FPS
medium	162 FPS	28 FPS
high	142 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	30 FPS
medium	118 FPS	18 FPS
high	101 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	10 FPS
medium	79 FPS	7 FPS
high	66 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 2100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
1080p
low	433 FPS	55 FPS
medium	363 FPS	29 FPS
high	294 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	16 FPS
medium	238 FPS	9 FPS
high	194 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	5 FPS
medium	102 FPS	3 FPS
high	84 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 2100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
1080p
low	855 FPS	84 FPS
medium	693 FPS	67 FPS
high	609 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	63 FPS
medium	527 FPS	51 FPS
high	452 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	42 FPS
medium	355 FPS	34 FPS
high	308 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 2100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
1080p
low	775 FPS	84 FPS
medium	639 FPS	67 FPS
high	558 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	42 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	62 FPS
medium	503 FPS	48 FPS
high	435 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	34 FPS
medium	322 FPS	25 FPS
high	298 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 2100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 1,871 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1110.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1219 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score	22,651+1111%	1,871
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+750%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+1668%	1.248 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+108%	1219 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	136+325%	32
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+3208%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+12700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+12700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 128.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP	160W	35W-78%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+165%	53.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 62.7% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 350.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).