G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅666.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 411.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅666.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 411.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 3200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 666.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 2,209 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 925.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 100.5% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 666.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 925.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 3200 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 2,209 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	177 FPS	41 FPS
medium	162 FPS	27 FPS
high	142 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	29 FPS
medium	118 FPS	17 FPS
high	101 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	10 FPS
medium	79 FPS	7 FPS
high	66 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	433 FPS	78 FPS
medium	363 FPS	49 FPS
high	294 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	22 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	24 FPS
medium	238 FPS	17 FPS
high	194 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	7 FPS
medium	102 FPS	5 FPS
high	84 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	855 FPS	99 FPS
medium	693 FPS	80 FPS
high	609 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	75 FPS
medium	527 FPS	60 FPS
high	452 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	50 FPS
medium	355 FPS	40 FPS
high	308 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	775 FPS	99 FPS
medium	639 FPS	80 FPS
high	558 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	75 FPS
medium	503 FPS	60 FPS
high	435 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	50 FPS
medium	322 FPS	40 FPS
high	298 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 3200

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 2,209 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 925.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	22,651+925%	2,209
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+580%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+1493%	1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	136+325%	32
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+2587%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 84.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	160W	65W-59%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-15%	82°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+316%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 costs 50.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 411.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).