G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅155.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 415.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅155.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 415.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
25.1% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 5100?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 155.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 5,500 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro WX 5100 is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016, 311.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 8 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $100 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and you are getting 155.6% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 311.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 415.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro WX 5100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 5100 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 5100 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	177 FPS	101 FPS
medium	162 FPS	85 FPS
high	142 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	47 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	87 FPS
medium	118 FPS	73 FPS
high	101 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	35 FPS
medium	79 FPS	32 FPS
high	66 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	433 FPS	111 FPS
medium	363 FPS	85 FPS
high	294 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	79 FPS
medium	238 FPS	58 FPS
high	194 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	41 FPS
medium	102 FPS	32 FPS
high	84 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	855 FPS	248 FPS
medium	693 FPS	198 FPS
high	609 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	186 FPS
medium	527 FPS	148 FPS
high	452 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	124 FPS
medium	355 FPS	99 FPS
high	308 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	62 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
1080p
low	775 FPS	225 FPS
medium	639 FPS	193 FPS
high	558 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	174 FPS
medium	503 FPS	148 FPS
high	435 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	97 FPS
medium	322 FPS	77 FPS
high	298 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX 5100

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 5100

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 311.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score	22,651+312%	5,500
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+143%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+467%	3.892 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+133%	1086 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+21%	112
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+877%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1.2% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1%	7.906 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.4
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX 5100
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	173mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-15%	82°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+93%	73.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 20% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 416.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).