GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+403.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,498 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅+403.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,498 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 4,498 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 403.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 403.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
1080p
low	177 FPS	100 FPS
medium	162 FPS	86 FPS
high	142 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	41 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	87 FPS
medium	118 FPS	75 FPS
high	101 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	27 FPS
medium	79 FPS	26 FPS
high	66 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
1080p
low	433 FPS	119 FPS
medium	363 FPS	88 FPS
high	294 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	67 FPS
medium	238 FPS	45 FPS
high	194 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	25 FPS
medium	102 FPS	17 FPS
high	84 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	10 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
1080p
low	855 FPS	202 FPS
medium	693 FPS	162 FPS
high	609 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	101 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	152 FPS
medium	527 FPS	121 FPS
high	452 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	101 FPS
medium	355 FPS	81 FPS
high	308 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
1080p
low	775 FPS	144 FPS
medium	639 FPS	116 FPS
high	558 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	104 FPS
medium	503 FPS	85 FPS
high	435 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	62 FPS
medium	322 FPS	47 FPS
high	298 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 4,498 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 403.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	22,651+404%	4,498
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+240%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+752%	2.588 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+151%	1011 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+70%	80
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+1287%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+3100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 84.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP	160W	65W-59%
Recommended PSU	550W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+105%	69.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).