GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 330

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 2561.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 779.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $81 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
  • 42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $318 less on MSRP ($81 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2561.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4231% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 523), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R5 330 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $318 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $81, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 779.2% (56.8 vs 6.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R5 330's 523 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 4231%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score
22,651+4231%
523
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4352+1033%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+2705%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+148%
1024 MHz
ROPs
48+500%
8
TMUs
136+467%
24
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+4678%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+24515%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R5 330 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 330 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 330) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+24515%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 330). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 330).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon R5 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
TDP
160W
50W-69%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
168mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+1249%
10.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R5 330 launched at $81. On MSRP, Radeon R5 330 was 79.7% cheaper ($318 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.5 (Radeon R5 330) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 773.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R5 330
MSRP
$399
$81-80%
Performance per Dollar
56.8+774%
6.5
Codename
AD106
Weston
Release
May 18 2023
April 18 2017
Ranking
#59
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.