
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Radeon R7 A265
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 A265 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅1902.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 751% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌433.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A265
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 160W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 A265
The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R7 A265's 994 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 2178.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+2179% | 994 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1033% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+3382% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+207% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 136+467% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+4678% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R7 A265 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A265 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A265 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A265) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 A265). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A265). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 A265).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 30W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+328% | 33.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A265 was 62.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 747.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R7 A265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $149-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+748% | 6.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | Opal |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #59 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














