GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 M465

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M465

2016Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 M465 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 M465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 M465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 1620.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 543.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M465

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $279 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1620.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2038.9% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 1,059), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R7 M465 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $279 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 543.3% (56.8 vs 8.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 M465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R7 M465's 1,059 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 2038.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 M465 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M465). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
G3D Mark Score
22,651+2039%
1,059
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 3.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4352+1033%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+2453%
0.864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+125%
1125 MHz
ROPs
48+500%
8
TMUs
136+467%
24
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+4678%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+24515%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R7 M465 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M465 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M465 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M465. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M465) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
32 MB+24515%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCE 3.1
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 M465's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M465). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
TDP
160W
75W-53%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
Mobile
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+904%
14.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M465 was 69.9% cheaper ($279 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.8 (Radeon R7 M465) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 545.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon R7 M465
MSRP
$399
$120-70%
Performance per Dollar
56.8+545%
8.8
Codename
AD106
Topaz
Release
May 18 2023
May 15 2016
Ranking
#59
#867

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.