GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+3501.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 974% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (629 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025

Why buy it

✅+3501.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 974% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (629 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 629 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is a 2025 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3501.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 235.3% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $119 MSRP, and you are getting 3501.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 974%. Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes. Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $119 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti currently gives you 3501.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 974%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
1080p
low	177 FPS	28 FPS
medium	162 FPS	23 FPS
high	142 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	21 FPS
medium	118 FPS	17 FPS
high	101 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	14 FPS
medium	79 FPS	11 FPS
high	66 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
1080p
low	433 FPS	28 FPS
medium	363 FPS	23 FPS
high	294 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	21 FPS
medium	238 FPS	17 FPS
high	194 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	14 FPS
medium	102 FPS	11 FPS
high	84 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
1080p
low	855 FPS	28 FPS
medium	693 FPS	23 FPS
high	609 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	21 FPS
medium	527 FPS	17 FPS
high	452 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	14 FPS
medium	355 FPS	11 FPS
high	308 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
1080p
low	775 FPS	28 FPS
medium	639 FPS	23 FPS
high	558 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	21 FPS
medium	503 FPS	17 FPS
high	435 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	14 FPS
medium	322 FPS	11 FPS
high	298 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 629 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 3501.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 64 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) with 136 Tensor cores vs 128.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
G3D Mark Score	22,651+3501%	629
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	4352+6%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+117%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz	2920 MHz+15%
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	136	256+88%
L2 Cache	32 MB+300%	8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	64+88%
Tensor Cores	136+6%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	32 MB+300%	8 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
TDP	160W-47%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+6643%	2.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B costs 70.2% less ($280 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.3 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 971.7% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).