GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R9 255

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R9 255 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R9 255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅506.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 425.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 10.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 255

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 506.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1409.1% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 1,501), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R9 255 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $260 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 425.7% (56.8 vs 10.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R9 255 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 255

The Radeon R9 255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R9 255's 1,501 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1409.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 255 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 255). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 255).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 255
G3D Mark Score	22,651+1409%	1,501
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4352+143%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+571%	3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+21%	112
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+877%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 255 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 255 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 255
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 255 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 255. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 255) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 255
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 255's 190W — a 17.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 400W (Radeon R9 255). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 255
TDP	160W-16%	190W
Recommended PSU	550W	400W-27%
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+1692%	7.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon R9 255 launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R9 255 was 65.2% cheaper ($260 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10.8 (Radeon R9 255) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 425.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 255
MSRP	$399	$139-65%
Performance per Dollar	56.8+426%	10.8
Codename	AD106	Tonga
Release	May 18 2023	September 2 2014
Ranking	#59	#365

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 255 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.