
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 260
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+643.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 158.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 260
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,048 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon R9 260
2013Why buy it
- ✅+643.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 158.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,048 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon R9 260?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 260 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 34 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R9 260

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 260
Radeon R9 260
The Radeon R9 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 5 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R9 260's 3,048 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 643.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 260). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4.849 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 260).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+643% | 3,048 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+355% | 4.849 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+583% | 0.63 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 260 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 260 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 260 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 260) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 260's 275W — a 52.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon R9 260). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-42% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+1176% | 11.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 260 launched at $139. The Radeon R9 260 costs 65.2% less ($260 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 21.9 (Radeon R9 260) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 159.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $139-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+159% | 21.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | Hawaii |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #316 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












