G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+1036% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 754.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon R9 M385X

2015

Why buy it

✅+1036% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 754.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,994 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M385X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 1,994 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R9 M385X is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 1036.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 33.0% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1036.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M385X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R9 M385X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M385X is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,994 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M385X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	177 FPS	36 FPS
medium	162 FPS	22 FPS
high	142 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	24 FPS
medium	118 FPS	14 FPS
high	101 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	9 FPS
medium	79 FPS	6 FPS
high	66 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	425 FPS	57 FPS
medium	359 FPS	31 FPS
high	292 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	28 FPS
medium	229 FPS	15 FPS
high	186 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	8 FPS
medium	95 FPS	5 FPS
high	77 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	855 FPS	90 FPS
medium	693 FPS	72 FPS
high	609 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	67 FPS
medium	527 FPS	54 FPS
high	452 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	45 FPS
medium	355 FPS	36 FPS
high	308 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
1080p
low	775 FPS	63 FPS
medium	639 FPS	52 FPS
high	558 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	37 FPS
medium	503 FPS	31 FPS
high	435 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	25 FPS
medium	322 FPS	20 FPS
high	298 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 M385X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R9 M385X

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 M385X

The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 1,994 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1036%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
G3D Mark Score	22,651+1036%	1,994
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4352+386%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+1019%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+130%	1100 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	136+143%	56
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+1855%	0.22 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+12700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M385X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M385X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+12700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 M385X
TDP	160W	75W-53%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	141.6+432%	26.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M385X costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 760.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).