G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+391.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 699.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌57.9% longer card at 240mm vs 152mm.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 152mm instead of 240mm, a 88mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,609 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
62.7% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅+391.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 699.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 152mm instead of 240mm, a 88mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌57.9% longer card at 240mm vs 152mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,609 vs 22,651).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
62.7% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon R9 Nano?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 4,609 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R9 Nano is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 391.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $250 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 391.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 699.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 Nano still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 Nano is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $649 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 Nano Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	177 FPS	116 FPS
medium	162 FPS	99 FPS
high	142 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	93 FPS
medium	118 FPS	78 FPS
high	101 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	33 FPS
medium	79 FPS	30 FPS
high	66 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 Nano

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	425 FPS	207 FPS
medium	359 FPS	166 FPS
high	292 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	156 FPS
medium	229 FPS	124 FPS
high	186 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	98 FPS
medium	95 FPS	80 FPS
high	77 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 Nano

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	855 FPS	207 FPS
medium	693 FPS	166 FPS
high	609 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	156 FPS
medium	527 FPS	124 FPS
high	452 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	104 FPS
medium	355 FPS	83 FPS
high	308 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 Nano

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
1080p
low	775 FPS	196 FPS
medium	639 FPS	164 FPS
high	558 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	137 FPS
medium	503 FPS	117 FPS
high	435 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	82 FPS
medium	322 FPS	68 FPS
high	298 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon R9 Nano

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R9 Nano

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 4,609 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 391.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 Nano uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
G3D Mark Score	22,651+391%	4,609
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4352+6%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+169%	8.192 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+154%	1000 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	256+88%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+330%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 Nano lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Nano relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Nano has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Nano) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 Nano. Bus width: 128-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	512 GB/s+78%
Bus Width	128-bit	4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R9 Nano). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
DirectX	12.2+2%	12
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Nano). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 Nano's 175W — a 9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 550W (Radeon R9 Nano). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 152mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon R9 Nano
TDP	160W-9%	175W
Recommended PSU	550W	550W
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	240mm	152mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+438%	26.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 38.5% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 700% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).