GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 339.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 52.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
  • 41.2% longer card at 240mm vs 170mm.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
  • Measures 170mm instead of 240mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 339.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 515.2% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 3,682), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer frame-generation stack, DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR Frame Generation (2023), a 5nm process instead of 14nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52.6% (56.8 vs 37.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 560's 3,682 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 515.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
22,651+515%
3,682
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 4.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4352+325%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS+745%
2.611 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+99%
1275 MHz
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
136+113%
64
L1 Cache
4.3 MB+1620%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+3100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 560 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
32 MB+3100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCE 3.4
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
TDP
160W
75W-53%
Recommended PSU
550W
450W-18%
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
240mm
170mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70 C
Perf/Watt
141.6+188%
49.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 52.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX 560
MSRP
$399
$99-75%
Performance per Dollar
56.8+53%
37.2
Codename
AD106
Polaris 21
Release
May 18 2023
April 18 2017
Ranking
#59
#527

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.