
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+578.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 119.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,340 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+578.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 119.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 25.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,340 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 560X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 560X

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 560X's 3,340 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 578.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+578% | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+325% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+745% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+99% | 1275 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+1620% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 560X relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 400W-27% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+218% | 44.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129. The Radeon RX 560X costs 67.7% less ($270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 25.9 (Radeon RX 560X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 119.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $129-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+119% | 25.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












