
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+157.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 47.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 185W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,799 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌15.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅+157.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 47.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 185W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,799 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌15.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 580 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 75 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 580

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 580's 8,799 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 157.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+157% | 8,799 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+257% | 6.175 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+89% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+668% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 580 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 14.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-14% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+197% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 47.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+48% | 38.4 |
| Codename | AD106 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #59 | #301 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












