
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+325.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌565% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
Radeon RX 6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $339 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,319 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅+325.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $339 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌565% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,319 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 30 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6300

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 325.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6300) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+326% | 5,319 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+467% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+498% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+6% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+183% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+1620% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+183% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6300 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+350% | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+300% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 128.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 35W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 300W-45% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 152.0+7% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 85% less ($339 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 56.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $60-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8 | 88.7+56% |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #379 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












