GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 640

CPU

GPU

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

RTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 640

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 640 Performance Spectrum

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

8 GB 160

22,651

+942.9%

GeForce GTX TITAN X

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 3080

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

2,172

0.0%

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅649.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 315.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 649.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 942.9% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 2,172), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $240 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $159, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 315.6% (56.8 vs 13.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 640

The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 640's 2,172 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 942.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
G3D Mark Score	22,651+943%	2,172
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4352+580%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+1315%	1.559 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+108%	1218 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	136+240%	40
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+2587%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 640 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 640 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 640. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+6300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCE 3.4
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+226%	43.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 640 was 60.2% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 13.7 (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 314.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 640
MSRP	$399	$159-60%
Performance per Dollar	56.8+315%	13.7
Codename	AD106	Polaris 23
Release	May 18 2023	May 13 2019
Ranking	#59	#665

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.