
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Radeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅13.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 230W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 6700 XT
2021Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$479 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 41.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌43.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6700 XT
The Radeon RX 6700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,754 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 19,754 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 14.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+15% | 19,754 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+67% | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2581 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 40+18% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT carries 12 GB. Radeon RX 6700 XT gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 XT. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6700 XT. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6700 XT's 230W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-30% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+65% | 85.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the Radeon RX 6700 XT launched at $479. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 16.7% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 6700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 37.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-17% | $479 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+38% | 41.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #80 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














