
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1109.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 594.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 7500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,873 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7500
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1109.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 594.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,873 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 21 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 21 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7500

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7500
Radeon RX 7500
The Radeon RX 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,873 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 7500's 1,873 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1109.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7500 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 7500). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7500). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 36 (Radeon RX 7500) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+1109% | 1,873 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+95% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+3% | 2450 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7500 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7500 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 216 GB/s (Radeon RX 7500) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 7500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+33% | 216 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7500's 175W — a 9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon RX 7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-9% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+1223% | 10.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7500 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 7500 costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.2 (Radeon RX 7500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 592.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+593% | 8.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












