
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅52.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 90W.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 160W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅52.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 160W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌77.8% higher power demand at 160W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 7600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7600M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 10,999 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 105.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2410 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7600M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+106% | 10,999 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+143% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+28% | 17.27 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+5% | 2410 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+21% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+21% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 56% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 90W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+16% | 122.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












