
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 49.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 260W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 276mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 GRE across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 260W vs 160W.
- ❌15% longer card at 276mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 7900 GRE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 49.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 260W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 276mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅10.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900 GRE across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 260W vs 160W.
- ❌15% longer card at 276mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900 GRE better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 144 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 662 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 571 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 276 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,162 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 27,162 — the Radeon RX 7900 GRE leads by 19.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 80 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 27,162+20% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 5120+18% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+108% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+13% | 2245 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 160+233% |
| TMUs | 136 | 320+135% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+72% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 80+135% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 7900 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 260W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-38% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 276mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 60°C-14% |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+36% | 104.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 27.3% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 49.5 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 14.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+15% | 49.5 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












