
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+366.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 134% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+366.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 134% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 24.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,852 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.3 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 4,852 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 366.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+367% | 4,852 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+13% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+36% | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+20% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+630% | 19.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H launched at $200. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H costs 49.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 24.3 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 133.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $200-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+134% | 24.3 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













