GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON X700 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON X700 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON X700 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅9190.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 13270.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌41.2% longer card at 240mm vs 170mm.

RADEON X700 PRO

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Measures 170mm instead of 240mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9190.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 29703.9% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 76), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM and native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RADEON X700 PRO has no comparable frame-generation support. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 more expensive on MSRP at $399 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 13270.7% (56.8 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON X700 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RADEON X700 PRO

The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 29703.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 80 (RADEON X700 PRO) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON X700 PRO
G3D Mark Score	22,651+29704%	76
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352	5120+18%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	45.98 TFLOPS+108%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+13%	2245 MHz
ROPs	48	160+233%
TMUs	136	320+135%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+72%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	80+135%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RADEON X700 PRO does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X700 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON X700 PRO
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 PRO. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON X700 PRO
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+3100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON X700 PRO
DirectX	12.2+36%	9_0b
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 240mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON X700 PRO
TDP	160W-38%	260W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	Legacy
Length	240mm	170mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	141.6+47100%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179. On MSRP, RADEON X700 PRO was 55.1% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.4 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 14100% better value.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RADEON X700 PRO
MSRP	$399	$179-55%
Performance per Dollar	56.8+14100%	0.4
Codename	AD106	Navi 31
Release	May 18 2023	July 27 2023
Ranking	#59	#29

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search RADEON X700 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.