G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅36.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅36.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 36.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 51.9% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 136 vs 96 Tensor cores.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 51.9% more raw performance headroom and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 36.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 51.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	177 FPS	160 FPS
medium	162 FPS	146 FPS
high	142 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	132 FPS
medium	118 FPS	112 FPS
high	101 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	77 FPS
medium	79 FPS	67 FPS
high	66 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	433 FPS	356 FPS
medium	363 FPS	300 FPS
high	294 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	221 FPS
medium	238 FPS	191 FPS
high	194 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	109 FPS
medium	102 FPS	90 FPS
high	84 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	855 FPS	671 FPS
medium	693 FPS	537 FPS
high	609 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	445 FPS
medium	527 FPS	377 FPS
high	452 FPS	319 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	327 FPS
medium	355 FPS	268 FPS
high	308 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	161 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	775 FPS	632 FPS
medium	639 FPS	537 FPS
high	558 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	503 FPS
medium	503 FPS	403 FPS
high	435 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	324 FPS
medium	322 FPS	268 FPS
high	298 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	168 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 14,909 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 51.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 96.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	22,651+52%	14,909
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352+42%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+70%	12.99 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+20%	2115 MHz
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	136+42%	96
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+43%	3 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+167%	12 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+42%	24
Tensor Cores	136+42%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+13%	256 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+167%	12 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	NVENC (Ada)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (Ada)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-18%	85
Perf/Watt	141.6	298.2+111%