G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅75.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅112.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 64).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

✅75.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅112.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 64).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti averages 75.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 22,651 vs 11,162 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 102.9% more raw performance headroom and the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 75.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 102.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (35W vs 160W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 160W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti currently gives you 102.9% higher G3D Mark and 75.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	177 FPS	135 FPS
medium	162 FPS	120 FPS
high	142 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	121 FPS
medium	118 FPS	100 FPS
high	101 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	68 FPS
medium	79 FPS	60 FPS
high	66 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	433 FPS	201 FPS
medium	363 FPS	171 FPS
high	294 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	140 FPS
medium	238 FPS	114 FPS
high	194 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	161 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	81 FPS
medium	102 FPS	67 FPS
high	84 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	855 FPS	502 FPS
medium	693 FPS	402 FPS
high	609 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	251 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	377 FPS
medium	527 FPS	301 FPS
high	452 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	251 FPS
medium	355 FPS	201 FPS
high	308 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	126 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	775 FPS	453 FPS
medium	639 FPS	386 FPS
high	558 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	251 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	377 FPS
medium	503 FPS	301 FPS
high	435 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	217 FPS
medium	322 FPS	170 FPS
high	298 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	126 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 11,162 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 102.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 64.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	22,651+103%	11,162
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352+113%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+166%	8.294 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+25%	2025 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+113%	64
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+115%	2 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+167%	12 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+113%	16
Tensor Cores	136+113%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+125%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+167%	12 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 128.2% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	160W	35W-78%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	318.9+125%