
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 650.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅194.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 136).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌902.5% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 33.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) with 136 Tensor cores vs 400.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 30,269+34% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 12800+194% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+196% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2550 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 136 | 400+194% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 12.5 MB+191% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 100+194% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 400+194% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation carries 32 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 100% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+17% | 121.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 90% cheaper ($3601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 647.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-90% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+647% | 7.6 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #16 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














